Is This the Death of
Christianity in
Bill Muehlenberg
I just returned from the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal in
While the full report of 100 pages will not appear until next week, a
short summary by Judge Higgins said that the two Danny’s (Daniel Scot and
Daniel Nalliah) breached section 8 of the Racial and
Religious Tolerance Act 2001 which says a person cannot engage in conduct that
"incites hatred against, serious contempt for, or revulsion or severe
ridicule of, that other person or class of persons".
While exemptions are in place for "any genuine academic, artistic,
religious or scientific purposes; or any purpose that is in the public
interest", the Judge found that these exceptions did not here apply,
because the person’s conduct could "not be regarded as reasonable and in
good faith".
Interestingly, section 9 of the Act says a "person’s motive in
engaging in any conduct is irrelevant". If so, how can one be accused of
acting in bad faith? Who decides what is reasonable here or unreasonable?
The Judge said that Pastor Scot "failed to differentiate between
Muslims throughout the world, that he preached a literal translation of the Quran and of Muslims’ religious practices which were not
mainstream".
Most Muslims would of course object to this, arguing that they do adhere
to a literal understanding and translation of the Quran.
And how does a secular judge with no expertise in religion make such decisions,
when Islamic scholars themselves are divided on such crucial questions of
theology, interpretation and exegesis?
Much of what the Judge considered offensive was simply quotations from
the Quran itself. To argue that quoting a religious
book makes one guilty of vilification would put 98% of religious discussions
out of bounds.
The whole tenure of the ruling is that one religious group cannot
frankly and openly speak of another religion, for fear of vilification. Or in
this case, it amounts to shutting up Christians who dare try to criticize
Muslims or any other religion.
The exclusive claims of the Christian gospel, in other words, are
directly at threat here. We mounted a determined fight about this law when it
was first introduced in 2000. We said it would put at risk freedom of speech in
general and would act as an anti-Christian law in particular.
This is exactly what we are now seeing. Christians should be greatly
concerned about this decision, as should all who value freedom of speech.
The truth is, probably the majority of what any Christian has said or
written about other faiths will be found to be vilifying, based on the
decisions of the Judge. Many of us are now liable for jail terms or hefty
fines.
This could well be the beginning of a government-sanctioned crackdown on
Christianity in
What is to be done?
The sentences have not yet been handed down, and appeals will
undoubtedly be forthcoming, even though great expense has already been incurred
by the two Pastors.
In the meantime, several things can be done. We should all make a public
protest about this decision. Write letters to newspapers,
get on talk-back radio, contact your Victorian MPs.
Also, the Victorian legislation needs to be turned back. Write to your
local State MP, asking that this destructive law be removed.
Also, we need, like in the
Finally, we all need to pray, and pray hard.
This is a very serious decision indeed. Much more detailed analysis
needs to go into the decision, including a close look at the full 100 page
finding. But the initial prospects do not look good at all.
This decision must serve as a wake up call to all believers. We are in
very real danger of losing our religious freedoms in
All Christians should be concerned by this decision. Unfortunately not
all are. The
Of course if your gospel is one that makes no distinctions and offers no
exclusive truth claims, then sure, we can all share one big religious
bandwagon. But if you believe that the claims of Christ are distinctive and
exclusive, that truth is important, then this decision
is alarming.
The question is, are you ready for prison ministry? That is where many
of us may soon be heading if this decision stands. Now is the time for people
of faith to stand up and be counted. If we do not, we may well see the death of
Christianity in